Porn Desensitization: Is It Real, and Can You Reverse It?

Porn desensitization is community language for arousal that fades with repeated porn. Lab studies have shown that kind of fading, but whether heavy porn use causes lasting desensitization, and whether it can be reversed, is still open.

Researchers use three related terms: habituation, tolerance and escalation. This guide explains each one, what the studies measured and where the evidence stops. For the basics, see our porn addiction guide, and for what brain studies can and can’t show, see porn and the brain.

Porn Desensitization at a Glance

Question	Short answer
Is porn desensitization a research term?	No. It’s community language. The closest research words are habituation (O’Donohue & Geer, 1985), tolerance and escalation (Ince et al., 2024).
Does arousal fade in the lab?	Yes. Arousal to the same erotic material falls with repetition and returns with something new (Koukounas & Over, 2000).
Do people report tolerance?	Yes. In a 2022 study of 1,541 people in Poland, self-reported tolerance went with more severe compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic porn use (Lewczuk et al., 2022).
Do brain scans show it?	Scans have found stronger reactions to porn cues in people with compulsive sexual behavior, but they can’t show that porn caused the difference (Voon et al., 2014).
Is it permanent?	The evidence doesn’t answer that yet. The closest controlled test of a break measured craving and withdrawal, not arousal (Fernandez et al., 2023).
Can it be reversed?	The evidence is mostly clinical reports and forum journals. Clinical reports suggest that stopping porn is sometimes enough to reverse negative effects (Park et al., 2016).
Is it the same as death grip?	No. Death grip is slang for reduced penile sensation from frequent, forceful masturbation (International Society for Sexual Medicine, 2025).
When should I get help?	See a doctor if erection or orgasm problems last, and a therapist if urges keep winning despite a plan.

What Is Porn Desensitization?

Porn desensitization is community language for porn that does less for you than it used to, often with a need for more time, novelty or more extreme material.

Habituation is the drop in arousal that comes from repeated exposure to the same stimulus (O’Donohue & Geer, 1985). Tolerance is needing more of something to get the same effect. Escalation is moving to more intense or unusual content over time. Ince and colleagues (2024) label increasing how much people watch “quantitative tolerance,” and progressing to more stimulating genres “qualitative escalation.” In their framing, both are ways users can harness novelty to overcome desensitization (Ince et al., 2024).

The idea also shows up in people’s own words. On online forums for “rebooting,” the community term for quitting porn, members describe “desensitization and tolerance to the effects of pornography over time” in their journals (Fernandez et al., 2021).

Death grip syndrome is a different idea. The International Society for Sexual Medicine calls it a slang term for “the overall desensitization of the penis due to frequent and rigorous masturbation, often with a lot of pressure being placed on the penis.” The society adds that the situation is not currently recognized in the medical community (International Society for Sexual Medicine, 2025). This guide is about arousal that fades with repeated porn, not reduced sensation in the penis. For the physical version, see our death grip guide.

The flatline is another term people mix up with desensitization. In the forum study, close to one-third of members described diminished sexual desire during abstinence, which they called the “flatline” (Fernandez et al., 2021). Desensitization, by contrast, is weaker arousal while you’re still watching porn. For the flatline, see porn flatline.

Is Porn Desensitization Real?

In lab experiments, yes: arousal to the same erotic material falls with repetition and returns when something new appears. Whether heavy porn use causes lasting desensitization isn’t settled, because the lab studies were short, and studies of long-term use are surveys and interviews that can’t show cause.

The habituation research goes back decades. In a 1985 experiment with 40 male volunteers, sexual arousal fell with repeated presentations of erotic stimuli. The design controlled for physiological fatigue, so the authors concluded that habituation was involved (O’Donohue & Geer, 1985). In a 2000 study of men, a repeated erotic film segment produced a progressive decrease in sexual arousal. A novel segment raised arousal and absorption again, and reintroducing the familiar one showed dishabituation, the return of the response (Koukounas & Over, 2000).

Women show a similar pattern. In a 1990 study, women’s arousal fell over repeated viewings of the same erotic film or repeated use of the same sexual fantasy, and novel erotic stimuli brought it back (Meuwissen & Over, 1990). A 1986 study had 56 women and men watch the same explicit film every day for four days. Self-rated negative feelings rose with repetition and returned to their starting level when something new was introduced. Men became more aroused and more concerned by new actors, while women did so by the same actors doing new acts (Kelley & Musialowski, 1986).

The 1990 and 2000 studies measured arousal within one session, and the 1986 study ran for four days. They show that arousal can fade with repetition and return with novelty. None of these lab studies followed people’s porn use over years.

Wanting novelty is also a normal part of sexual response. A 2015 review of partner novelty research concluded that arousal and desire appear to drop with familiarity and rise with novelty in men and women, possibly more so in men (Morton & Gorzalka, 2015). In two experiments with hypothetical dating choices, men were more likely than women to choose variety or a novel partner (Hughes et al., 2021). The pattern has a name, the Coolidge effect, and that guide covers what animal and human studies do and don’t show. Wanting novelty isn’t unique to porn.

Why Do Some People Need More Extreme Porn?

Tolerance and escalation show up in people who describe problematic porn use, in surveys, network analyses and interviews. These studies show links, not proof that porn caused the pattern.

In a preregistered survey of 1,541 people in a nationally representative Polish sample, 51.2% of them women, self-reported tolerance and withdrawal were both linked with more severe compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic porn use. The authors describe the study as preliminary evidence on an understudied topic (Lewczuk et al., 2022).

In a 2020 network analysis of 4,253 men who completed an online questionnaire measuring problematic use with the short Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale, tolerance sat near the center of the symptom network, alongside salience, withdrawal and conflict. Central symptoms are the ones most closely tied to the rest, and how often men watched sat at the edge (Bőthe et al., 2020). Our porn addiction symptoms guide describes these symptoms.

Ince and colleagues (2024) ran network analyses on two samples of men, 1,356 and 944. Tolerance sat at the center, and it acted as a bridge between other patterns, such as binges, and all measured facets of problematic use. The authors wrote that their results are consistent with other research treating tolerance, binges, tab-jumping and edging as relevant features of problematic use (Ince et al., 2024).

Qualitative studies describe the same progression. In a 2023 study of 67 people who self-identified as having problematic porn use, 76% of them men, the authors described people moving to more intense patterns, including tolerance, escalation and binges (Ince et al., 2023). In 23 interviews with men in treatment for problematic internet sex use, which included porn and cybersex, the researchers found evidence of several forms of tolerance. Withdrawal was the least pronounced of the addiction criteria they examined (Blinka et al., 2022).

One older experiment points the same way. In a 1986 study, students and nonstudents watched an hour of common, nonviolent porn each week for six weeks, or innocuous material instead. Two weeks later, people who had considerable prior exposure to common porn showed little interest in it and chose uncommon genres instead. The preference also appeared in women, but was far less pronounced (Zillmann & Bryant, 1986). It was a single experiment, and it measured choices, not how escalation unfolds over years.

Clinical case reports describe the same pattern in individuals. The Park review describes three active duty servicemen. In the first, a 20-year-old reported that he gradually needed more graphic or fetish material to orgasm, and he opened several videos at once. The review presented these clinical reports to propose a possible direction for future research, and it said intervention studies, in which people stop using porn, would better establish whether there is a connection (Park et al., 2016). Escalation like this is one reason people ask whether gooning is a sign of porn addiction.

What Happens in the Brain?

Brain studies find differences in people with compulsive porn use, including stronger reactions to porn cues. In one study the difference was in anticipation rather than in the response to the porn itself, and each of these studies compared people at one point in time.

In a 2014 study, 19 heterosexual men with compulsive sexual behavior and 19 healthy male volunteers watched sexually explicit videos in a brain scanner. The men with compulsive sexual behavior reported greater desire but similar liking, and their brains showed more activity in regions that earlier studies of drug cues had identified (Voon et al., 2014). That split fits the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction, in which cues can amplify “wanting,” the drive to seek a reward, without necessarily amplifying “liking,” the pleasure the reward brings (Berridge & Robinson, 2016).

A 2017 study compared 28 heterosexual men seeking treatment for problematic porn use with 24 heterosexual men without it. The treatment-seeking men showed stronger ventral striatum activity when cues signaled erotic pictures, but the groups did not differ in their responses to the erotic pictures themselves. For desensitization, that distinction matters: the difference was in anticipation, not in the response to the porn itself (Gola et al., 2017).

A 2016 study of 22 men with compulsive sexual behavior and 40 male volunteers found a stronger preference for novel sexual images. In a scanner subset of 20 men per group, the men with compulsive sexual behavior showed greater habituation in the dorsal cingulate, a brain region, to repeated sexual images than to repeated money images. The amount of habituation went with the preference for novelty (Banca et al., 2016).

Two studies found weaker brain responses to sexual images in heavier or problem users, and researchers disagree about what that means. In a 2014 study of 64 healthy men in Berlin, more self-reported hours of porn a week went with less gray matter in the right caudate, part of the striatum, and with weaker left putamen activity during a sexual cue task. The authors offered two readings: the differences “could reflect change in neural plasticity as a consequence of an intense stimulation of the reward system,” or “it could be a precondition that makes pornography consumption more rewarding” (Kühn & Gallinat, 2014).

A 2015 study of 122 people used a brain-wave measure, the late positive potential. People who reported problems regulating their porn use and also reported higher desire for sex with a partner showed lower responses to sexual images. The authors wrote that this pattern “appears different from substance addiction models” (Prause et al., 2015). Park and colleagues read both results another way, as a sign that frequent viewers need greater visual stimulation to get a brain response (Park et al., 2016). Studies that measured people once can’t settle which reading is right. Our guide to brain research on porn covers these studies, and the dopamine claims, in more depth.

Can Porn Make Real Sex Feel Less Exciting?

Problematic porn use and feeling addicted have been linked with sexual problems in several studies, while how often people watch has not shown a consistent link. Much of the evidence on partner sex comes from surveys, and it is mixed.

A 2019 review of observational studies found “little if no evidence” that porn use may induce delayed ejaculation and erectile dysfunction. It said the strongest evidence was for a link between porn use and lower sexual satisfaction, though prospective results were inconsistent (Dwulit & Rzymski, 2019).

A 2019 study of three samples of sexually active men who used porn found that self-reported problematic use was linked with erection problems at a single time point, but mere use was not consistently linked. In the sample followed for a year, porn variables were not linked with changes in erections (Grubbs & Gola, 2019).

A 2021 survey of 942 heterosexual men aged 18 to 44, recruited through Reddit groups about internet pornography, found no evidence that porn use was linked with erection problems, early ejaculation or sexual satisfaction. Feeling addicted, as the men rated it, was linked in small to moderate ways with erection problems, early ejaculation and lower sexual satisfaction (Whelan & Brown, 2021). A 2021 community survey of 14,581 people, including 4,352 women, found a similar split in women and men: problematic use had a moderate link with sexual functioning problems, while how often people watched had a weak link with fewer of them (Bőthe et al., 2021).

A 2024 prospective study of 309 people in romantic relationships looked at arousal from porn and arousal from a partner at the start. Two months later, they completed the relationship measures again. Feeling aroused by porn went with declines in people’s own sexual satisfaction and in relationship quality and stability over those two months. Arousal from a partner did not go with those changes (Lawless & Karantzas, 2024).

A 2016 study of 487 college men aged 18 to 29 in the US found that the more porn a man watched, the more likely he was to use it during sex, to picture porn to stay aroused and to worry about his own sexual performance and body image. In the same men, more porn use went with less enjoyment of sexually intimate behavior with a partner. Because it was a survey, it can’t show which came first (Sun et al., 2016).

Desensitization is also different from finishing too early; for that, see porn and premature ejaculation. For erection problems specifically, see our guide to porn-induced erectile dysfunction.

Can You Reverse Porn Desensitization?

Whether arousal returns after a longer break hasn’t been settled by controlled research. The closest evidence is a seven-day trial, clinical reports and forum journals, and each has limits.

The closest controlled test is a 2023 randomized trial of 176 undergraduates who used porn at least three times a week in the past four weeks, 64.2% of them women. Students were assigned to try abstaining for seven days (86 students) or to keep watching as usual (90 students). Each night they recorded craving, positive and negative affect, and withdrawal symptoms. The main analysis found no evidence of withdrawal-related symptoms in the students who abstained. An exploratory analysis found an abstinence effect on craving only among students with high problematic use who had watched daily over the four weeks. The authors said that finding should be read with caution and tested in prospective studies. The trial measured craving, affect and withdrawal, not arousal (Fernandez et al., 2023).

Clinical reports point in a more hopeful direction, but they describe individual cases. Park and colleagues wrote that clinical reports suggest ending porn use is sometimes sufficient to reverse negative effects, and they called for studies in which people stop using it. In one of those reports, a 20-year-old serviceman stopped using a sex toy and cut back on porn, though he said he could not completely stop. At a urology visit a few weeks later, he was having orgasms with his partner again. That is one case with two changes at once (Park et al., 2016).

Forum journals add a personal view. The authors of the 2021 journal study wrote that members attributed a range of benefits to abstinence, which suggests abstaining from porn could potentially be a beneficial intervention for problematic porn use. They also said future prospective studies are needed to rule out other explanations for those perceived benefits. The journals capture only what members chose to write about (Fernandez et al., 2021).

Our suggestion: keep a short log for a few weeks. Note how your interest in partner sex, your arousal to porn and your cravings change, so you have your own timeline instead of a number from a study. For what quitting porn can involve, see what happens when you quit porn.

How to Reset: What Helps

These steps aren’t proven cures. Some draw on research about related problems, and we say so where it applies.

1. Cut back, or test a break. A short break is a test you can run yourself, not a proven fix. In the 2023 seven-day trial, students who abstained showed no evidence of withdrawal-related symptoms (Fernandez et al., 2023). Track what changes for you rather than expecting a set result.

2. Stop the escalation habits first. Ince and colleagues (2024) wrote that their results fit other research treating binges, tab-jumping and edging as relevant features of problematic use (Ince et al., 2024). Starting with those habits is a reasonable first step.

3. Plan for urges, and don’t fight them head-on. Trying to suppress porn thoughts was a common strategy in the forum journals. The authors wrote that thought suppression is “a counterproductive thought control strategy” because it “leads to rebound effects” (Fernandez et al., 2021). Instead, notice the urge and let it pass. Urge surfing teaches you to watch an urge rise and fall without acting on it.

4. Shift attention toward touch and connection with a partner. The forum study’s authors suggested that mindful sexual activity may allow arousal to be conditioned beyond porn cues. That is a hypothesis, not a tested result (Fernandez et al., 2021).

5. Get support, and consider therapy. In the forum study, social support and accountability appeared to be the external resources most helpful for staying abstinent (Fernandez et al., 2021). A 2025 meta-analysis, which pools results from many studies, found that psychotherapy improved problematic porn use more than control conditions did, with large effects on problematic use and related measures and small effects on craving. Most of its 20 studies tested cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and the authors found a high risk of bias (López-Pinar et al., 2025).

When to Get Help

See a doctor if erection or orgasm problems last, and a therapist if porn use feels out of control or urges keep winning despite a plan. A doctor can also check for other causes.

Porn addiction isn’t a diagnosis in DSM-5, the American Psychiatric Association’s manual. DSM-5 did not include the proposed criteria for hypersexual disorder (Kraus, Voon & Potenza, 2016). ICD-11, the World Health Organization’s classification, lists compulsive sexual behaviour disorder under code 6C72 (World Health Organization). It places the disorder among impulse control disorders, not with disorders due to substance use and addictive behaviors (Kraus et al., 2018). Only a clinician can make a diagnosis.

Our porn addiction treatment guide compares treatment options and how to find a qualified therapist.

If you’re having thoughts of harming yourself, or your mood is very low, call or text 988 (the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline in the US), or your local emergency number.

The Bottom Line

• Lab habituation is documented. In a handful of lab studies from 1985 to 2000, arousal to the same erotic material fell with repetition and came back with something new.
• Tolerance shows up in surveys and interviews. People who describe problematic use report needing more, and binges, tab-jumping and edging appear in that work, but the studies show links, not cause.
• Brain differences are reported but unsettled. Stronger reactions to porn cues have been found in people with compulsive use, measured at one point in time, and researchers read the findings differently.
• Reversal hasn’t been settled. The closest controlled test was a seven-day break that measured craving, not arousal, and the longer-term evidence is clinical reports and forum journals.
• Get help when it isn’t enough. See a doctor for lasting erection or orgasm problems, and a therapist when urges keep winning. In a 2025 meta-analysis, most of the 20 psychotherapy studies tested CBT or ACT.

If you want daily structure while you cut back, the TrueAlly app offers daily check-ins, streaks and bite-sized lessons on dopamine loops and habit formation, though it isn’t a porn blocker or a medical treatment.

---

Sources

• Banca, P., Morris, L. S., Mitchell, S., Harrison, N. A., Potenza, M. N., & Voon, V. (2016). Novelty, conditioning and attentional bias to sexual rewards. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 72, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.10.017
• Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2016). Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. American Psychologist, 71(8), 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000059
• Blinka, L., Ševčíková, A., Dreier, M., Škařupová, K., & Wölfling, K. (2022). Online sex addiction: A qualitative analysis of symptoms in treatment-seeking men. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 907549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.907549
• Bőthe, B., Lonza, A., Štulhofer, A., & Demetrovics, Z. (2020). Symptoms of problematic pornography use in a sample of treatment considering and treatment non-considering men: A network approach. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(10), 2016–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.030
• Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., Griffiths, M. D., Potenza, M. N., Orosz, G., & Demetrovics, Z. (2021). Are sexual functioning problems associated with frequent pornography use and/or problematic pornography use? Results from a large community survey including males and females. Addictive Behaviors, 112, Article 106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106603
• Dwulit, A. D., & Rzymski, P. (2019). The potential associations of pornography use with sexual dysfunctions: An integrative literature review of observational studies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(7), Article 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070914
• Fernandez, D. P., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). The pornography “rebooting” experience: A qualitative analysis of abstinence journals on an online pornography abstinence forum. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(2), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01858-w
• Fernandez, D. P., Kuss, D. J., Justice, L. V., Fernandez, E. F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2023). Effects of a 7-day pornography abstinence period on withdrawal-related symptoms in regular pornography users: A randomized controlled study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(4), 1819–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02519-w
• Gola, M., Wordecha, M., Sescousse, G., Lew-Starowicz, M., Kossowski, B., Wypych, M., Makeig, S., Potenza, M. N., & Marchewka, A. (2017). Can pornography be addictive? An fMRI study of men seeking treatment for problematic pornography use. Neuropsychopharmacology, 42(10), 2021–2031. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.78
• Grubbs, J. B., & Gola, M. (2019). Is pornography use related to erectile functioning? Results from cross-sectional and latent growth curve analyses. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.11.004
• Hughes, S. M., Aung, T., Harrison, M. A., LaFayette, J. N., & Gallup, G. G. (2021). Experimental evidence for sex differences in sexual variety preferences: Support for the Coolidge effect in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(2), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01730-x
• Ince, C., Albertella, L., Liu, C., Tiego, J., Fontenelle, L. F., Chamberlain, S. R., Yücel, M., & Rotaru, K. (2024). Problematic pornography use and novel patterns of escalating use: A cross-sectional network analysis with two independent samples. Addictive Behaviors, 156, Article 108048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108048
• Ince, C., Fontenelle, L. F., Carter, A., Albertella, L., Tiego, J., Chamberlain, S. R., & Rotaru, K. (2023). Clarifying and extending our understanding of problematic pornography use through descriptions of the lived experience. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 18193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45459-8
• International Society for Sexual Medicine. (2025, April 9). What is “death grip syndrome” during male masturbation and how might it affect partnered sexual activity? https://www.issm.info/sexual-health-qa/what-is-death-grip-syndrome-during-male-masturbation-and-how-might-it-affect-partnered-sexual-activity
• Kelley, K., & Musialowski, D. (1986). Repeated exposure to sexually explicit stimuli: Novelty, sex, and sexual attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(6), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01542313
• Koukounas, E., & Over, R. (2000). Changes in the magnitude of the eyeblink startle response during habituation of sexual arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(6), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00075-3
• Kraus, S. W., Krueger, R. B., Briken, P., First, M. B., Stein, D. J., Kaplan, M. S., Voon, V., Abdo, C. H. N., Grant, J. E., Atalla, E., & Reed, G. M. (2018). Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 109–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20499
• Kraus, S. W., Voon, V., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Should compulsive sexual behavior be considered an addiction? Addiction, 111(12), 2097–2106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13297
• Kühn, S., & Gallinat, J. (2014). Brain structure and functional connectivity associated with pornography consumption: The brain on porn. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(7), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.93
• Lawless, N. J., & Karantzas, G. C. (2024). Porn or partner arousal? When it comes to romantic relationships, not all sexual arousal is equal: A prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53(9), 3451–3460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02985-4
• Lewczuk, K., Wizła, M., Glica, A., Potenza, M. N., Lew-Starowicz, M., & Kraus, S. W. (2022). Withdrawal and tolerance as related to compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic pornography use: Preregistered study based on a nationally representative sample in Poland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 11(4), 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00076
• López-Pinar, C., Esparza-Reig, J., & Bőthe, B. (2025). Psychotherapy for problematic pornography use: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 14(2), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00018
• Meuwissen, I., & Over, R. (1990). Habituation and dishabituation of female sexual arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90004-3
• Morton, H., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). Role of partner novelty in sexual functioning: A review. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(6), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2014.958788
• O’Donohue, W. T., & Geer, J. H. (1985). The habituation of sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01542106
• Park, B., Wilson, G., Berger, J., Christman, M., Reina, B., Bishop, F., Klam, W., & Doan, A. (2016). Is internet pornography causing sexual dysfunctions? A review with clinical reports. Behavioral Sciences, 6(3), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs6030017
• Prause, N., Steele, V. R., Staley, C., Sabatinelli, D., & Hajcak, G. (2015). Modulation of late positive potentials by sexual images in problem users and controls inconsistent with “porn addiction.” Biological Psychology, 109, 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.06.005
• Sun, C., Bridges, A., Johnson, J. A., & Ezzell, M. B. (2016). Pornography and the male sexual script: An analysis of consumption and sexual relations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0391-2
• Voon, V., Mole, T. B., Banca, P., Porter, L., Morris, L., Mitchell, S., Lapa, T. R., Karr, J., Harrison, N. A., Potenza, M. N., & Irvine, M. (2014). Neural correlates of sexual cue reactivity in individuals with and without compulsive sexual behaviours. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102419
• Whelan, G., & Brown, J. (2021). Pornography addiction: An exploration of the association between use, perceived addiction, erectile dysfunction, premature (early) ejaculation, and sexual satisfaction in males aged 18–44 years. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 18(9), 1582–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.014
• World Health Organization. ICD-11: 6C72 Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. https://icd.who.int/browse/2024-01/mms/en#1630268048
• Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1986). Shifting preferences in pornography consumption. Communication Research, 13(4), 560–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365086013004003
• 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. (n.d.). 988 Lifeline. https://988lifeline.org/